Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 6:23:52 GMT -5
The more it "moves" through anesthetizing figures when collecting revenue, and the more it "advertises" spending, including as a way of demonstrating supposed efficiency in the management of public resources. The concern raised here is due to the fact that taxes on consumption have a strong anesthetizing characteristic, being little noticed by consumers since they are still embedded in the prices of goods [7] . Unless serious information policies are promoted for the population, such charges tend to be associated with other costs of production and circulation of the merchandise, with the economic repercussions often not even being considered by those who purchase such items.
The point even draws attention if we consider that the promotion of greater fiscal transparency represents one of the main lines of the reform proposals, which advocate simplification as an informative ideal that, in itself, would be sufficient to stimulate social participation in formatting of fiscal policies. We understand that something more is needed. If the tax reform is approved in its current form, and if it is not Chinese Europe Phone Number List accompanied by an effective policy of transparency and tax education, there is a risk that individuals will not perceive the increase in product costs as resulting from the adoption of a uniform tax rate and without distinction between the sectors of the economy, crediting the return of taxes with a welfare character, artificially created based on an illusory scenario, especially for low-income families, the right targets of said public policy.
We have the typical scenario of fiscal illusion, with the possibility of an increase in indirect taxes — typically anesthetizing — being accompanied by public spending that is more easily perceived by the population, namely: the direct and focused return of the fiscal burden on the public of low income, under the guise of " income transfer mechanisms " – and not the achievement of contributory capacity and the existential minimum, as proposed here. As stated above, these statements are not intended to oppose the formation of effective and efficient policies to reduce social inequalities. We argue that this direction must unconditionally guide the actions of any and all democratically elected governments, precisely because they constitute an indispensable fundamental objective of the Republic, and we recognize in the proposals the merit of addressing the discussion in the public arena.
The point even draws attention if we consider that the promotion of greater fiscal transparency represents one of the main lines of the reform proposals, which advocate simplification as an informative ideal that, in itself, would be sufficient to stimulate social participation in formatting of fiscal policies. We understand that something more is needed. If the tax reform is approved in its current form, and if it is not Chinese Europe Phone Number List accompanied by an effective policy of transparency and tax education, there is a risk that individuals will not perceive the increase in product costs as resulting from the adoption of a uniform tax rate and without distinction between the sectors of the economy, crediting the return of taxes with a welfare character, artificially created based on an illusory scenario, especially for low-income families, the right targets of said public policy.
We have the typical scenario of fiscal illusion, with the possibility of an increase in indirect taxes — typically anesthetizing — being accompanied by public spending that is more easily perceived by the population, namely: the direct and focused return of the fiscal burden on the public of low income, under the guise of " income transfer mechanisms " – and not the achievement of contributory capacity and the existential minimum, as proposed here. As stated above, these statements are not intended to oppose the formation of effective and efficient policies to reduce social inequalities. We argue that this direction must unconditionally guide the actions of any and all democratically elected governments, precisely because they constitute an indispensable fundamental objective of the Republic, and we recognize in the proposals the merit of addressing the discussion in the public arena.