Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 4:11:12 GMT -5
"This is what happens when a sacred broad electoral victory is viciously and unceremoniously stolen from great patriots ," was the message with which Trump closed the attack on the Capitol on January 6 of this year by his followers.
It is a fact that while he was delivering that historic message, he did not imagine all the consequences that his call to protest the "theft of the election" would entail. Today he and the Democrats are experiencing firsthand a lack of financial support from corporations and have called this act a "cancel culture ," which has given rise to controversy.
Given this, IBM —a company aligned with its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)—had a completely correct response and has expressed it. Shall we tell you what it is about?
What is cancel culture?
This term refers to the drastic measure to withdraw moral, financial, digital and even social support from those public figures, organizations and companies that have done or said something offensive.
And CSR?
CSR is a way of management and doing Ecuador Mobile Number List business, in which the company ensures that its operations are economically, socially and environmentally sustainable, recognizing the interests of its stakeholders . This brings great benefits such as increasing brand reputation, customer loyalty and increased credibility. But... why are two such different terms in the social spotlight today?
The controversy: CSR vs cancel culture
Both terms have entered into controversy because following the storming of the Capitol, a growing list of business leaders are denying funding against the 147 Republican members of Congress who opposed the Electoral College vote on January 6 . Additionally, technology companies are doing the same against Trump and some of his supporters by denying them access to their social media or e-commerce platforms.
This situation is calling into question the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of the companies that have refused funding, as for many Republicans cancel culture has now become a damage control strategy for legislators due to its connection to the failed insurrection attempt.
It is possible to understand cancel culture from certain contexts, but the reality is that in the corporate world this is something completely different. In fact…
Cancel culture is an existential threat to the corporate social responsibility movement.
This is stated in an article published in Triple Pundit written by Tina Casey. And to show that companies can decide what to do about their CSR policies, IBM has defended its stance on corporate cancel culture.
IBM, a success story in CSR against cancel culture
Christopher A. Padilla, vice president of government and regulatory affairs at IBM, is among business leaders who recognize the threat that the vilification of cancel culture poses to the voice of many companies on matters of moral, social and civic concern.
"Many of our peers in corporate America have begun suspending their financial contributions to elected officials who opposed the clear and certain outcome of the election," Padilla wrote. “But this moment in history should be about much more than organizations temporarily withholding political money to take a stand. “This is an opportunity for us to pause and reflect, to see what policy measures can truly restore confidence in our democracy.”
IBM's position regarding what happened
To back up what Padilla says, he noted that IBM has a decades-long policy of not making political donations, either directly or through a PAC. From this nonpartisan platform, he pledged that IBM would support Congress and the incoming Joe Biden administration on a series of reforms aimed at limiting the ability of the Republican Party, or anyone else, to mount another insurrection.